Seat of arbitration: problematic issues of theory and practice

The effectiveness of arbitration, as well its attractiveness for disputing parties, depends more on the existing and developed legislative framework convention (ratification numerous multilateral international legal instruments) national arbitration legislation. It is combination these sources that guarantees procedural autonomy while significantly reducing interference courts, In addition to existence mandatory optional rules provision such assistance in arbitration.
 Unfortunately, a consideration foreign economic disputes by commercial may be too complex even sometimes unclear problematic. However, this ambiguity interpretation understanding law can addressed paying sufficient attention definitional apparatus, assessment development improvement regulationslegal acts gradually depart from archaic approaches definition regulatory through effective analysis.
 Thus, article special paid theoretical applied problematic issues determination «seat arbitration». Due clear inconsistencies uncertainty legislation enforcement activities many countries regarding place leads «procedural traps» considering applications recognition award author pays analysis regulation Ukraine. And, perspective jurisprudence European Court Human Rights Supreme Court, conclusions are drawn corresponding contradictions apparatus.